Monday 12 August 2013

Is there any debate about fracking?


Where is the debate or is it a case of just take the medicine, its good for you because we are telling you and here's a hundred quid to swallow it. 

This is what the Daily Telegraphy reported as to the government's case for gas shale tracking:

David Cameron set out the economic benefits including cheaper energy bills for millions, tens of thousands of jobs and windfalls for communities which are sitting on vast reserves of shale gas. He also pledged that fracking would not damage Britain’s countryside and would only result in a “very minor change to the landscape”.

'It’s been suggested in recent weeks that we want fracking to be confined to certain parts of Britain. This is wrong. I want all parts of our nation to share in the benefits: north or south, Conservative or Labour. We are all in this together'. 

Mr Cameron made clear that the potential benefits are too good to ignore. He said that fracking has “real potential to drive energy bills down”, adding: “It’s simple – gas and electric bills can go down when our home grown energy supply goes up.

There were also large rewards on offer to communities which find themselves sitting on vast reserves. He said: 'Companies have agreed to pay £100,000 to every community situated near an exploratory well – somewhere where they’re looking to see if shale gas exists. If shale gas is then extracted, one per cent of the revenue – perhaps as much as £10million - will go straight back to residents who live nearby'.

He said: 'We must make the case that fracking is safe. International evidence shows there is no evidence why fracking should cause contamination of water supplies or other environmental damage, if properly regulated'.

'If properly regulated'. Ah yes, its called Privatisation. Give pigs wings and they will fly. 

Here is the argument against fracking presented as facts quoted from http://www.dangersoffracking.com


Hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking”, is the process of drilling and injecting fluid into the ground at a high pressure in order to fracture shale rocks to release natural gas inside.

Each gas well requires an average of 400 tanker trucks to carry water and supplies to and from the site

It takes 1-8 million gallons of water to complete each fracturing job

The water brought in is mixed with sand and chemicals to create fracking fluid. Approximately 40,000 gallons of chemicals are used per fracturing.
  
Up to 600 chemicals are used in fracking fluid, including known carcinogens and toxins such as…

The fracking fluid is then pressure injected into the ground through a drilled pipeline.

500,000 Active gas wells in the US 8 million gallons of water per fracking
 18 times a well can be fracked

The mixture reaches the end of the well where the high pressure causes the nearby shale rock to crack, creating fissures where natural gas flows into the well.

During this process, methane gas and toxic chemicals leach out from the system and contaminate nearby groundwater.

Methane concentrations are 17x higher in drinking-water wells near fracturing sites than in normal wells

Contaminated well water is used for drinking water for nearby cities and towns.
There have been over 1,000 documented cases of water contamination next to areas of gas drilling as well as cases of sensory, respiratory, and neurological damage due to ingested contaminated water

The waste fluid is left in open air pits to evaporate, releasing harmful VOC’s (volatile organic compounds) into the atmosphere, creating contaminated air, acid rain, and ground level ozone

In the end, hydraulic fracking produces approximately 300,000 barrels of natural gas a day, but at the price of numerous environmental, safety, and health hazards

There are numerous YouTube videos showing water on fire from drinking pipes in areas of Australia and other hazards in the USA. The sheer amount of water used and problems of storing and disposing of contaminated waste alone is alarming not to mention the demand for eater during a drought.

There is nothing so blind as greed. Effort should surely be increased to reduce our energy consumption and develop alternative technologies?